http://doyoulovems.com/archives/65 Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:21:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 http://doyoulovems.com/archives/65#comment-63 John Scholes Thu, 02 Aug 2007 09:50:25 +0000 http://doyoulovems.com/archives/65#comment-63 Stephen, many thanks for that. But I do not think it helps much. See discussion in my article <a href="http://doyoulovems.com/archives/66" rel="nofollow">today</a>. Stephen, many thanks for that. But I do not think it helps much. See discussion in my article today.

]]> http://doyoulovems.com/archives/65#comment-60 Do you love Microsoft? : Clarification from MS - and time to eat some humble pie? Thu, 02 Aug 2007 09:41:43 +0000 http://doyoulovems.com/archives/65#comment-60 [...] McGibbon of MS points out, tactfully, (in a comment to an earlier article here) that I have not read the MS Open Specification Promise (OSP carefully enough. At the end it has [...] […] McGibbon of MS points out, tactfully, (in a comment to an earlier article here) that I have not read the MS Open Specification Promise (OSP carefully enough. At the end it has […]

]]> http://doyoulovems.com/archives/65#comment-57 Stephen McGibbon Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:39:25 +0000 http://doyoulovems.com/archives/65#comment-57 The OSP covers required elements of optional portions too .... “In connection with the specifications listed below, this Promise also applies to the required elements of optional portions of such specifications.” The OSP covers required elements of optional portions too ….
“In connection with the specifications listed below, this Promise also applies to the required elements of optional portions of such specifications.”

]]>